Alger, C. (2007). Engaging student teachersí hearts and minds in the struggle to address (il)literacy in content area classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(8), 620-630.
Author. (2008). Reading across curriculum. www.readingacrosscurriculum.com
Bayerl, K. (2007). Rigor plus support: How science teachers use literacy techniques to gets students ready for college. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
Blachowicz, C., & Fisher, P. (2006). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Harvard College Library. (2007). Interrogating texts: 6 reading habits to develop in your first year at Harvard. Retrieved June 29, 2008 from Harvard University, Harvard Libraries Site: http://hcl.harvard.edu/research/guides/lamont_handouts/interrogatingtexts.html.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. 2007. Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to
enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Harste, J. C. (2000). Six points of departure. In B. Berghoff, K. A. Egawa, J. C. Harste & B. T. Hoonan (Eds.), Beyond reading and writing: Inquiry, curriculum, and multiple ways of knowing (pp. 1-16). Urbana IL: NCTE.
Kane, S. (2007). Literacy & learning in the content areas. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway, Publishers, Inc.
Learning Point Associates. (2005). Implementing No Child Left Behind Act: Using student engagement to improve adolescent literacy. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489536)
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Moore, D., Bean, T., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement for the Commission of Adolescent Literacy of the International Reading Association, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(1), 97-112. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ592830)
National Institute for Literacy. (2007). What content area teachers should know. (ED-04-CO-0094). Jessup, MD: EdPubs.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHHD). (2000a). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication NO.00-4769). Retrieved June 29, 2008, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.cfm.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHHD). (2000b). Comprehension. In Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (chap. 4). (NIH Publication NO.00-4769). Retrieved June 29, 2008, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/ch4.pdf.
Onofrey, K. & Theurer, J. (2007). Whatís a teacher to do: Suggestions for comprehension strategy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60, 7.
Robb, L., Klemp, R., & Schwartz, W. (2002). Readerís handbook: A student guide for reading and learning. Wilmington, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Scientific method. (2008). In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved July 3, 2008, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific method
Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I donít get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.